Back to all

From the Boardroom: Treating Federal Status as a Governance Issue

In many companies, federal registration is viewed as a low-level administrative task, delegated to a junior clerk. This is a governance failure. For a company that relies on government revenue, the federal registration is a "License to Operate." Losing it is akin to losing a medical license or a liquor license—it stops revenue instantly. Therefore, understanding how to renew Corporate Governance and verifying its completion should be a standing agenda item for the Board of Directors or the C-Suite Risk Committee.

Corporate Secretaries and General Counsels play a vital role here. They must ensure that the company's corporate records (Articles of Incorporation, Board Resolutions) match the data in the federal system. A discrepancy between what the Board approves and what the clerk types into the database can create legal exposure. The renewal process is the annual opportunity to align the corporate reality with the federal digital twin.

Document Retention and Institutional Memory

Boards are concerned with continuity. If the registration is managed by a single employee who gets hit by a bus, the company is vulnerable.

Governance best practices dictate that the registration credentials and the renewal documentation be stored in a secure, central repository accessible to corporate officers, not just on one person's laptop. The Board should mandate a "Key Man" contingency plan for federal access. Who has the backup MFA token? Who has the MPIN? Ensuring these assets are managed like treasury keys is a fiduciary duty.

Reviewing the "Reps and Certs"

The "Representations and Certifications" section of the registration contains questions about criminal proceedings, lobbying, and tax delinquency. These are high-liability questions.

A junior employee might check "No" to a question about "civil judgements" because they simply aren't aware of a lawsuit the company settled. This creates a False Claim. The Board or Legal Counsel should review the "Reps and Certs" before they are submitted annually. This "four eyes" principle ensures that the company's highest governing body is aware of, and approves, the assertions being made to the government.

The Subsidiary and Joint Venture Map

For complex organisations with multiple subsidiaries or Joint Ventures, the governance challenge is mapping. The Board needs to know which entities are active, which are dormant, and which are expiring.

We recommend presenting a "Compliance Dashboard" to the Board quarterly. This dashboard should list every UEI, its expiration date, and its current status. This visibility prevents the "orphan entity" problem where a subsidiary's registration lapses, disqualifying it from a key contract bid, to the surprise and anger of the parent company's Board.

Audit Committee Oversight

The Audit Committee should include federal registration testing in their internal audit plan. They should verify that the bank accounts listed in the system match the authorised corporate accounts.

This prevents internal fraud. It also ensures that the company is ready for a DCAA or IG audit. If the Audit Committee can certify to the full Board that the federal compliance posture is robust, it lowers the overall risk profile of the organisation.

Conclusion

Federal compliance is too important to be invisible. By elevating the renewal process to the boardroom, companies ensure that it receives the oversight, resources, and strategic attention it requires to safeguard shareholder value.

Call to Action

Elevate your compliance standards with board-level governance strategies.